Abstract: . . .  by the Institute or NHLBI staff who are co-authors must remove their names from it. Staff are reminded that each author is responsible for everything in the manuscript, irrespective of his Page 11 The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension study (DASH) Page 11 of 11 or her involvement in any specific part of the research effort. When appropriate, the manuscript should contain a disclaimer, indicating that what is being reported . . .
. . .  Institute or NHLBI staff who are co-authors must remove their names from it. Staff are reminded that each author is responsible for everything in the manuscript, irrespective of his Page 11 The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension study (DASH) Page 11 of 11 or her involvement in any specific part of the research effort. When appropriate, the manuscript should contain a disclaimer, indicating that what is being reported  . . .
. . .  NHLBI staff who are co-authors must remove their names from it. Staff are reminded that each author is responsible for everything in the manuscript, irrespective of his Page 11 The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension study (DASH) Page 11 of 11 or her involvement in any specific part of the research effort. When appropriate, the manuscript should contain a disclaimer, indicating that what is being reported or claimed does . . .
. . .  staff who are co-authors must remove their names from it. Staff are reminded that each author is responsible for everything in the manuscript, irrespective of his Page 11 The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension study (DASH) Page 11 of 11 or her involvement in any specific part of the research effort. When appropriate, the manuscript should contain a disclaimer, indicating that what is being reported or claimed does not . . .
. . .  co-authors must remove their names from it. Staff are reminded that each author is responsible for everything in the manuscript, irrespective of his Page 11 The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension study (DASH) Page 11 of 11 or her involvement in any specific part of the research effort. When appropriate, the manuscript should contain a disclaimer, indicating that what is being reported or claimed does not necessarily reflect . . .
. . .  policies. Differences of opinion about the scientific interpretation of results can be a reason for returning a paper without approval, if reviewers' opinions are well-founded and adequately justified. Interpretations that overstep the data; for instance, implying causality where none can be inferred, or suggesting the need for intervention when it has not been proven to be effective, can be highly embarrassing to the authors and the Institute.  . . .
--3000,6,250,3419,22947